Energy Management Policy
- Approver:
- Academic Coordinating Committee
- Policy Owner:
- Vice President, Facilities, Capital Development, Risk, and Safety & Security
- Policy Lead(s):
- Environmental Sustainability & Energy Performance Manager
- Effective date:
- 2026-04-08
- Status:
- Approved
Policy Statement
The ÐÓ°ÉÔ´´ Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning (Conestoga) is committed to responsible energy management and continuous improvement of energy performance across all operations, facilities, and programming. This policy supports the Conestoga Sustainability Plan by establishing the framework through which Conestoga will manage energy consumption and minimize environmental impact to support institutional and regional climate goals.
Scope
This policy applies to all employees and applicable contractors, consultants, and individuals occupying or using Conestoga-owned or operated spaces. It governs energy use, energy-related operational activities, capital development, and procurement practices that influence institutional energy performance.
This policy primarily addresses Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, which result directly from Conestoga’s energy consumption and purchased utilities. While the primary focus is on these emission categories, the policy also supports decision-making and practices that may influence Scope 3 emissions where relevant.Definitions
ÐÓ°ÉÔ´´ maintains a glossary of terms specific to the instituion. The ones in use for this document are defined below.
- Energy Audit
- A systematic assessment of energy consumption within a facility or operation to identify inefficiencies, evaluate performance, and recommend improvements. Energy audits include data collection, benchmarking, and analysis of energy usage patterns to support the identification of cost-effective energy-saving opportunities. Audits may vary in scope, from basic walkthrough assessments to comprehensive, investment-grade evaluations.
- Energy Management System (EMS)
- A structured framework of procedures, programs, and practices designed to monitor, manage, and improve institutional energy performance. An EMS supports systematic planning, implementation, measurement, and continuous improvement of energy-related activities across operations, facilities, and decision-making processes.
- Energy Performance
- The measurable results related to energy use and energy efficiency within Conestoga’s operations, including consumption levels, demand patterns, intensity metrics, and greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy activities.
- Energy Performance Indicator (EPI)
- A quantitative metric used to monitor and evaluate changes in energy performance over time. EPIs may include energy use per square foot, greenhouse gas emissions per capita, energy cost per unit of output, or other indicators established to track progress toward energy objectives.
- Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
- Gases released into the atmosphere that contribute to climate change, including carbon dioxide (COâ‚‚), methane (CHâ‚„), nitrous oxide (Nâ‚‚O), and other regulated gases. GHG emissions at Conestoga result from energy use, fuel combustion, purchased electricity, and other institutional activities.
- Net Zero
- A state in which the greenhouse gas emissions released into the atmosphere by institutional activities are balanced by an equivalent amount of emissions removed or offset, resulting in no net increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases. Net Zero requires significant reductions in direct and indirect emissions before the use of offsets or removals.
- Scope 1 Emissions
- Direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources owned or controlled by Conestoga, including on-site fuel combustion (e.g., natural gas) and institutional vehicle fleets.
- Scope 2 Emissions
- Indirect greenhouse gas emissions associated with the generation of purchased electricity, heating, or cooling consumed by Conestoga.
- Scope 3 Emissions
- All other indirect greenhouse gas emissions resulting from institutional activities that occur from sources not owned or controlled by Conestoga, including emissions associated with commuting, procurement, waste, contracted services, and other upstream or downstream activities. Scope 3 emissions are influenced by institutional decisions but are not directly produced by Conestoga operations.
Policy
- Energy Management System
- Implementation Measures:
- Conestoga will develop, implement, and continuously improve an EMS aligned with internationally recognized standards, such as ISO 50001 or equivalent frameworks, as appropriate.
- Clear operating procedures for systems and equipment that impact energy consumption will be established to ensure consistent and efficient operation.
- Energy audits are conducted at regular intervals, with results used to identify inefficiencies, recommend corrective actions, and guide investment decisions.
- A system for tracking and analyzing institutional energy consumption will be maintained, with performance data used to inform planning and operational improvements.
- EMS objectives are reviewed and updated periodically to reflect technological advancements, operational changes, and institutional growth.
- Energy Supply, Use, and Performance
- Performance Measures:
- Conestoga establishes and enforces energy efficiency standards for buildings, equipment, and operations, consistent with industry best practices and regulatory requirements.
- An internal Energy Team supports institutional energy goals by sharing best practices, monitoring impacts, and mobilizing initiatives across departments.
- New construction and renovations incorporate energy-efficient design principles to reduce long-term energy consumption.
- Smart building technologies, including real-time monitoring and automated control systems, are integrated where feasible to support operational efficiency.
- Conestoga procures energy-efficient and renewable energy sources in alignment with its Sustainable Procurement Guidelines and establishes measures to mitigate supply risks, including opportunities for on-site energy generation.
- Reporting and Targets
- Accountability Measures:
- Conestoga will define and enforce institutional energy reporting requirements, ensuring regular assessment and communication of performance.
- Energy performance indicators (EPIs) will be established and maintained for major campus systems to support ongoing analysis and improvement.
- Annual regulatory energy reports and internal performance summaries will be compiled, reviewed, and used to inform operational and strategic decisions.
- Conestoga’s energy and emission reduction targets align with institutional sustainability commitments, including the Conestoga Sustainability Plan.
- Progress toward energy and emissions targets will be reviewed annually, with adjustments made to strategies as required.
- Awareness, Engagement, and Collaboration
- Engagement Strategies:
- Training related to this policy, including EMS components and energy efficiency practices, will be made available for all employees, students, and applicable contractors.
- Energy-related learning opportunities will be integrated into academic programming, research, and campus initiatives to support student engagement.
- Collaboration with external organizations, community partners, suppliers, and regional networks will be pursued to align efforts and ensure that indirect impacts, such as those associated with Scope 3 emissions, are considered in planning and decision-making.
- Conestoga will implement recognition and engagement initiatives that encourage participation in energy conservation and reward measurable reductions in energy use.
- Tools and platforms will be developed to allow students and employees to submit ideas, provide feedback, and participate in energy initiatives.
- Decision-Making and Financial Considerations
- Financial Commitments:
- Energy-related considerations will be embedded within routine capital planning and budgeting processes, ensuring that sustainability commitments are reflected in business-as-usual operations.
- Investments incorporate a review of the energy-related impacts over the entire investment lifecycle and prioritize using lifecycle cost analysis to ensure long-term operational and financial benefits.
- Cost savings achieved through conservation initiatives are reinvested into further energy efficiency improvements where feasible.
- Major capital or operational projects include justification for energy-related decisions, ensuring alignment with sustainability commitments and energy performance objectives.
- Conestoga proactively monitors advancements in energy-related technologies, standards, and best practices to reduce the risk of technological obsolescence and ensure that institutional decisions and programming remain aligned with leading-edge knowledge and long-term sustainability commitments.
Relevant Legislation and Related Documents
Related documents
Revision Log
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-08 | Policy created. Academic Coordinating Committee approved. |